Support Us
 
Amount
Details
Payment
Choose Your Donation Amount To Support VoteDown
Your support will help VoteDown in its non-profit mission to make American Democracy responsive to the will of the voters.
$10
$25
$50
$100
$250
$500
Make it monthly!
 
Yes, count me in!
 
No, donate once
Pay With Credit Card

Melanie Stansbury

 
Melanie A. Stansbury Image
Title
Representative
New Mexico's 1st District
Party Affiliation
Democrat
2025
2026
Social Media Accounts
Twitter
: @
Rep_Stansbury
Donate Against (Primary Election)
Donate Against (General Election)
Top Contributors
(2022 - current)
Top Industries
(2022 - current)
362,646
Retired
Retired
$362,646
Democratic/Liberal
$211,978
Leadership PACs
$207,300
Lawyers/Law Firms
$185,874
Casinos/Gambling
$98,900
VoteDown vs Influence Donors
Data supplied by OpenSecrets.org
Representative Offices
Address
6301 Indian School Rd
Suite
Suite 420
City/State/Zip
Albuquerque NM, 87110
Phone
505-346-6781
News
03/07/2025 --dailykos
House Democratic leadership privately confronted the roughly dozen progressive members of their caucus for apparently disregarding requests for decorum during President Donald Trump’s terrible speech to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday.According to Axios, the three most senior House Democratic leaders—Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, Minority Whip Katherine Clark, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries—gathered the group of disruptors on Thursday morning. The trio was reportedly “very unhappy” with the cadre of leftist lawmakers who (gasp!) coordinated outfits or refused to clap during Trump’s nearly two-hour speech. Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, Maxine Dexter of Oregon, Maxwell Frost of Florida, and Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, were among the progressive lawmakers called into the “come to Jesus meeting.”A source familiar with the gathering stressed that the lawmakers were “not getting yelled at” nor were they “being talked to like they are children.” Instead, House Democratic leadership said they wanted the affected legislators to “understand why their strategy is a bad idea.”Rep. Nydia Velazquez of New York and fellow Democrats protest President Donald Trump’s speech to Congress on March 4, 2025.“It doesn’t surprise me leadership is very upset. They gave specific instructions not to do that,” another source said, seemingly referring to a “dear colleague” letter that Jeffries sent to the caucus before Trump’s address. In the letter, Jeffries urged his colleagues to have a “strong, determined, and dignified Democratic presence in the chamber.” Democrats were also privately told not to use props during the president’s speech.But some rank-and-file Democrats ignored both requests. Stansbury, for instance, held a sign reading, “This is NOT normal,” which was yanked out of her hands by GOP Rep. Lance Gooden of Texas. And Frost wore a shirt donning the phrase, “No Kings Live Here,” an apparent reference to Trump’s description of himself as a “king” in a recent post on Truth Social.Democrats don’t seem to know how they plan to protest Trump—assuming they even want to at all. Those who vote in favor of the president’s agenda, even if they later admit that they screwed up, face few consequences. Meanwhile, silent protesters are admonished behind closed doors while those who object to Trump’s lies more blatantly—such as Rep. Al Green of Texas—get censured by the House, including by 10 fellow Democrats.Perhaps Democratic leadership wanted all protests to occur outside of the chamber. But considering that the bulk of their caucus has struggled to find an effective way to call out Trump, it’s shameful to pull aside the few members who have directly pushed back against the Trump administration.Surprising no one, other “Democrats”—like Rep. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania—have also admonished dissenters. On the day of Trump’s speech, Fetterman called the protests “a sad cavalcade of self owns and unhinged petulance” in a post on X.Notably, Democrats’ takedown of their own caucus’ protesting methods isn’t all that different from what Trump himself said shortly after Green was kicked out of the chamber. “This is my fifth such speech to Congress,” he said, “and once again, I look at the Democrats in front of me, and I realize there is absolutely nothing I can say to make them happy or to make them stand or smile or applaud.”Campaign Action
02/17/2025 --dailycaller
'Democrats are positively giddy about the price of eggs.'
02/13/2025 --theepochtimes
Elon Musk, a man absent from the proceedings, was a major focus—but possible solutions to waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid were addressed too.
02/12/2025 --pressherald
Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette challenges some of President Donald Trump's early moves to increase the efficiency of the federal government, pointing out that the inspectors general he fired focused on rooting out waste, fraud and abuse.
02/12/2025 --theepochtimes
Representatives from both parties leveled accusations at each other during heated hearing on improper payments by government.
02/12/2025 --theepochtimes
Representatives from both parties leveled accusations at each other during heated hearing on improper payments by government.
02/12/2025 --dailykos
Rep. Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico is the ranking Democrat on the House’s new Delivering on Government Efficiency subcommittee—and on Wednesday, she showed why. Along with the rest of the Democrats on the dais, Stansbury stood up for democracy at the subcommittee’s first hearing. She excoriated Republicans for their fealty to billionaires like Elon Musk, the unelected meddler who is supposedly cutting government waste with seemingly limitless power and impunity.Chaired by the reprehensible Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the subcommittee purportedly supports the work of the very unofficial Department of Government Efficiency, aka DOGE. President Donald Trump appointed Musk to run the so-called department, which has resulted in chaos as the billionaire and his minions trample through every government agency, recommending and enacting draconian cuts while gaining access to crucial data and information.“We are going to have so much fun in this committee,” Stansbury said before turning her attention to a video presented earlier by the GOP, which showed President Barack Obama signing a 2011 executive order that set up an oversight and advisory board in a push to limit government waste. “I actually worked on the waste EO that was referenced,” Stansbury said. “But there is one fundamental difference between the presidents and vice presidents that were shown on that video and what's happening today, and that is that they followed the law.”“We work for the American people,” Stansbury reminded her colleagues before denouncing Musk and the GOP’s attempts to characterize our federal workforce as waste. “Unfortunately, my colleagues right now are working on a reconciliation deal to cut Medicaid, to cut Medicare, and use that money to give tax breaks to their billionaire buddies. That is the gravy train that is actually going on here.”xxYouTube Video“Because this is the oversight committee, let’s do some oversight,” Stansbury said before digging in on Musk’s dangerous desire to hack our Treasury Department.“This system pays the bills,” she explained. “It pays our soldiers. It pays for the work that we do overseas. It pays your Social Security benefits. It pays your tax refunds. So why is Elon Musk and his hackers trying to access that system?"xxYouTube Video"So what is going on here, and why is this such a threat to the American people?” Stansbury proceeded. “We know they're trying to shut down payments. They're trying to shut down agencies. What's next? Are they going to shut down your Social Security payments? We don't know because they have no oversight,” Stansbury added, pointing out that Republicans have blocked attempts to subpoena the billionaire to appear in front of the committee. “So we are sounding the alarm,” Stansbury continued. “And no matter how many executive orders that Donald Trump signs or how many tweets the VP sends, you cannot rewrite the Constitution and we are going to hold you to account.”Hear, hear.xxYouTube VideoYou can help ensure that Daily Kos remains the paywall-free home for our shared fight for democracy and justice. Daily Kos is supported by readers like you.
02/12/2025 --axios
Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), the top Democrat on the House's DOGE subcommittee, called on Elon Musk to testify before the body during its first meeting Wednesday.Why it matters: Stansbury delivered a blistering criticism of the new Department of Government Efficiency, accusing President Trump and DOGE head Musk of wielding the new department to break the law.Driving the news: Stansbury said during the hearing she supported the goal of ensuring the government works better and more efficiently for Americans, but said lawmakers "can't just sit here today and pretend like everything is normal.""While we're sitting here, Donald Trump and Elon Musk are recklessly and illegally dismantling the federal government," Stansbury said.She went on to accuse Republicans of shielding Musk and Trump as they break the law and took aim at Vice President JD Vance for purportedly undermining the judiciary.State of play: If Musk is as committed to transparency as he claims to be, he should testify before the subcommittee, Stansbury said."Come and testify in front of the American people under oath, because we want to know what you're up to," she said.The big picture: The DOGE Subcommittee on Oversight is the congressional arm of the new department, and Stansbury had previously vowed to use her position on the committee to fight back against the dismantling of federal agencies.In the first weeks of the new Trump administration, DOGE has swept through federal agencies, gutting programs and career civil servants in the name of cost cutting.In the line of fire have been U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), among others.DOGE's activities have sparked lawsuits from labor unions seeking to hem in DOGE's access to confidential data.Go deeper: What to know about Elon Musk's DOGE
02/12/2025 --rollcall
Ranking member Melanie Stansbury talks with Chair Marjorie Taylor Greene during Wednesday’s Oversight and Government Reform DOGE Subcommittee hearing. Stansbury had a message for Elon Musk: “Come and testify in front of the American people under oath,” she said.
02/08/2025 --salon
New Mexico Rep. Melanie Stansbury wants the world's richest man to be "on the hook" for DOGE's legal damages
12/25/2024 --foxnews
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's, D-N.Y., loss in her bid for the top Democratic spot on the House Oversight Committee highlights a divide in her party.
12/17/2024 --kron4
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) on Tuesday defeated Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to lead Democrats on the Oversight and Accountability Committee in the next Congress, putting the feisty liberal veteran in one of the most powerful spots to confront President-elect Trump in his second term. The win was forecast a day earlier, when the Democratic Steering [...]
12/16/2024 --huffpost
A contest to determine who will lead Democrats on the Oversight Committee next year will go to the full conference after Ocasio-Cortez lost an early round.
12/12/2024 --theepochtimes
'I’m a big AOC fan,' Comer said. 'Obviously, I don’t agree with much of her policy, but I think she’s a good person. I think she’s very well-spoken.'
12/12/2024 --axios
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is facing strong headwinds – including opposition from House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) – as she tries to become the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee.Why it matters: Senior Democrats say that while Ocasio-Cortez is seen as the favorite over Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the race is still in play.The fight comes as several septuagenarian committee ranking members are facing desperate battles against – or yielding to – younger challengers."Many members are concerned about [the] precedent these races are setting," one senior House Democrat told Axios.What we're hearing: Pelosi has been approaching colleagues urging them to back Connolly over Ocasio-Cortez, according to two House Democrats with direct knowledge of her outreach.Connolly, 74, and Ocasio-Cortez, 35, are facing off to replace current Oversight Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.).Punchbowl News was first to report Pelosi's advocacy for Connolly. A Pelosi spokesperson did not offer a comment to Axios.State of play: One House Democrats familiar with Ocasio-Cortez's whip count said she "has pretty much the entire [Oversight] Committee with her."That is something that House Democrats' Steering Committee – which meets Tuesday to make its recommendations – will take seriously, the lawmaker said.Another House Democrat said their "gut tells me she gets it" and that Connolly's cancer diagnosis last month is "working against him."Still, lawmakers stressed that it is not a firm lock, noting that the full Democratic caucus has to vote on whether to approve the Steering Committee's suggestions.Zoom out: Several younger Democrats have used the threat of the incoming Trump administration to topple some of the party's oldest ranking members.Raskin, 61, succeeded in getting Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), 74, to step down from his post.So did Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), 60, with Natural Resources Committee ranking member Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), 76, though he now faces a challenge from 45-year-old Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.).Agriculture Committee ranking member David Scott (D-Ga.), 79, is seen as likely to fall to one of his two challengers: Reps. Jim Costa (D-Calif.), 72, or Angie Craig (D-Minn.), 52.Flashback: Pelosi told Axios last week that she was supporting "some" insurgent challenges against incumbent ranking members.She has been making calls on behalf of Costa, her fellow Californian, two House Democrats familiar with the matter told Axios.
12/05/2024 --theepochtimes
The assistant energy secretary refuted the significance of the claim, saying the decision to pause LNG was based on multiple reports.
12/05/2024 --axios
House Democratic leadership on Thursday laid out their timeline for deciding their committee ranking members in the 119th Congress.Why it matters: Democrats will have to adjudicate several hotly contested battles as part of effort by some lawmakers to oust some of their party's oldest panel leaders.House Democrats' Steering and Policy Committee will first meet to make recommendations on panel leadership and filling vacant seats.Then the full House Democratic caucus will have to vote on whether to approve those recommendations.Driving the news: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and his leadership team will decide on the membership of the steering committee this week, the three current co-chairs wrote in a letter first obtained by Axios.The panel will then hold meetings on Dec. 10 and 16 to make recommendations on committee ranking memberships, filling vacant committee slots and committee assignments for new members.Zoom out: Democrats have at least three potentially contested committee fights.Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) is running unopposed to lead the Natural Resources Committee after incumbent ranking member Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) withdrew his reelection bid, but Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) may jump into that race in Grijalva's stead.Reps. Angie Craig (D-Minn.) and Jim Costa (D-Calif.) are both challenging Agriculture Committee ranking member David Scott (D-Ga.).Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) is running for Oversight Committee ranking member and is expected to face a challenge from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Axios first reported.Zoom in: Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the current Oversight ranking member, had been running to unseat Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), but Nadler withdrew on Wednesday and endorsed Raskin.Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told Axios on Wednesday that she is supporting "some" of these challenges to incumbent ranking members.
11/27/2024 --wctrib
From the commentary, "Transgender Americans are right to be afraid. These people are not afraid to put down a duly elected member of Congress. Where does that leave others?"
11/23/2024 --whig
During the campaign, President-elect Donald Trump had hailed what would become Project 2025 as a conservative roadmap for “exactly what our movement will do." Trump pulled an about-face when Project 2025 became a political liability. He denied knowing anything about...
10/02/2024 --nbcnews
House Democrats need to flip just four seats to take the chamber’s majority in November, and super PACs are going all out on the airwaves in battleground districts, blasting Republicans over abortion and reproductive rights in ads.
09/24/2024 --theepochtimes
Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) and others hold a press conference on legislation to commercially disrupt global criminal networks and suppliers of illicit drugs like fentanyl at 2:00 p.m. ET on Sept. 24.
07/30/2024 --santafenewmexican
Steve Jones, a Republican with little chance to win a congressional seat, at least speaks his mind. He's supporting Donald Trump.
07/26/2024 --abcnews
Congressional Democrats in Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and beyond are seeing an outpouring of volunteers to help Vice President Kamala Harris and counter Republican Donald Trump
07/22/2024 --kron4
A number of Democratic lawmakers, governors and past leaders were quick to rally behind Vice President Harris as she pursues the Democratic Party's presidential nomination following President Biden's withdrawal from the race. Shortly after dropping out of the presidential race, Biden endorsed Harris as his successor, stating it is "time to come together and beat" [...]
 
Amount
Details
Payment
Choose Your Donation Amount
Your contribution will benefit the leading opponent of Melanie Stansbury in the next Primary election
$10
$25
$50
$100
$250
$500
Issues You Are Upset About
We will communicate these issues to Melanie Stansbury
Pay With Credit Card
 
Amount
Details
Payment
Choose Your Donation Amount
Your contribution will benefit the leading opponent of Melanie Stansbury in the next General election
$10
$25
$50
$100
$250
$500
Issues You Are Upset About
We will communicate these issues to Melanie Stansbury
Pay With Credit Card